Vector DB Pricing Compare
Select your vector count, embedding dimensions, and quantization; get ranked monthly TCO across the vector database market — including Serverless (Pinecone, Cloudflare), Managed Dedicated Clusters (Qdrant, Weaviate, Zilliz), PostgreSQL pgvector extensions, and self-hosted VPS baselines.
Workload Presets
Click to load common production scenariosWorkload Parameters
Ranked Monthly Cost (19 eligible)
Sorted lowest to highest total estimated monthly infrastructure cost — sorted strictly by price; totals within ~$2 are flagged near-ties (features may be the better decider). · All prices in US dollars; the one EUR-billed vendor (pgvector on Hetzner VPS) is converted at the hint above — invoice stays in EUR.Architecture & Cost Comparison Insights
Serverless vs Dedicated Clusters
Serverless models (Pinecone, Cloudflare Vectorize) excel for unpredictable traffic or prototype workloads, scaling to zero with no maintenance. However, under high sustained search throughput (10M+ queries/month), dedicated in-memory clusters (Qdrant, Milvus) are substantially cheaper since query RUs are bundled into node RAM.
pgvector vs Specialized Vector DBs
pgvector is hard to beat when vectors live alongside operational SQL data (Supabase, Neon, RDS), eliminating cross-database synchronization. Specialized engines (Qdrant, Pinecone, Weaviate) pull ahead above 10M+ vectors where multi-stage filtering, native quantization, and isolated HNSW indexing memory matter.
Quantization Impact on Infrastructure
Enabling Scalar (INT8) quantization reduces in-memory footprint by 75% while retaining >99% search recall. This turns what would be a $500+/mo dedicated cluster requirement into something a ~$30/mo VPS node (e.g. Hetzner CPX41) or a low-tier self-hosted instance can hold.
Head-to-Head Vector DB Comparisons
Read the August 2026 pricing report — 21 vendors, one benchmark or browse all 210 head-to-head comparisons.
Pinecone vs Qdrant
Pinecone Serverless is the zero-ops managed standard with per-GB/query billing. Qdrant Cloud (and self-hosted Qdrant on Hetzner) is 60–80% c…
Compare →Pinecone vs Weaviate
Weaviate shines for hybrid search (BM25+vector) and GraphQL. Pinecone shines for pure vector simplicity and managed scale. At 20M vectors, W…
Compare →Qdrant vs Chroma
Qdrant is the production workhorse (Rust, HNSW, quant). Chroma is the prototyping darling (Pythonic, embedded). Cost per million vectors fav…
Compare →Qdrant vs Weaviate
Both open-source and self-hostable on Hetzner. Qdrant is the sharper vector barb (filter + quant). Weaviate is the hybrid/graph story. Qdran…
Compare →pgvector (Supabase/Neon) vs Pinecone
pgvector keeps vectors beside your relational data in one ACID Postgres (no sync). Pinecone isolates and scales vector-only with serverless …
Compare →Cloudflare Vectorize vs Pinecone
Vectorize is dirt-cheap when you live on Workers (free tier generous, edge-near). Pinecone is the portable managed standard. Vectorize locks…
Compare →Turbopuffer vs Pinecone
Turbopuffer builds directly on NVMe SSD caching and S3 object storage, charging $0.05/GB-mo (85% cheaper than Pinecone $0.33/GB-mo). Pinecon…
Compare →MongoDB Atlas Vector Search vs pgvector (Supabase)
MongoDB Atlas Vector brings vector indexing natively into JSON document schemas with Lucene HNSW. pgvector brings vector embeddings into rel…
Compare →Best Vector DB by Use Case
Cheapest Vector DB for 100k-Vector RAG Prototypes
Prototyping needs <500k vectors, 1536-dim (OpenAI 3-small), <0.5M queries. Optimize for free tier and zero-ops, not throughput.
View Guide →5M Vectors · 768-dim · 10M queries — Cheapest Search
Product similarity search is read-heavy (10M+ queries/mo). Dedicated Qdrant/Weaviate with INT8 + HNSW amortizes 3× cheaper than serverless R…
View Guide →20M Vectors · Heavy Storage — Lowest TCO
Internal knowledge bases are storage-heavy enterprise workloads. Footprint with metadata reaches 20–40GB; dedicated/storage-optimized tiers …
View Guide →10M Code Vectors · 768-dim FP16 · 3M queries
Code embedding (CodeBERT/768) with FP16 halves RAM. Moderate steady reads with frequent upserts — favor self-host or dedicated with low writ…
View Guide →Self-Host Qdrant/pgvector on $17.02 Hetzner VPS
Open-source Qdrant/Weaviate/pgvector on Hetzner CPX/Cloud VPS is 5–10× cheaper than managed RU. Show the math for 500k–5M vectors.
View Guide →Hybrid BM25 + Vector — Best Ranker
Enterprise search wants hybrid scoring (keyword BM25 blended with vector cosine) — not pure ANN. Weaviate hybrid and Qdrant hybrid filters l…
View Guide →Vector Database Pricing & TCO FAQ
How do vector embedding dimensions impact monthly database cost?
Vector dimensions directly dictate memory and disk consumption. A 1,536-dimensional vector (OpenAI text-embedding-3-small) uses 6,144 bytes in standard 32-bit float (FP32), whereas a 768-dimensional vector (Nomic / BGE) uses 3,072 bytes. When stored in-memory with HNSW graph indexes, every doubling of dimension doubles RAM footprint, which can push dedicated clusters into significantly higher pricing tiers.
What is the cost difference between Serverless and Dedicated Pods/Clusters?
Serverless vector databases (e.g. Pinecone Serverless, Cloudflare Vectorize) charge strictly per-gigabyte of storage and per-million Read Units (RUs). They scale to zero at minimal idle cost. Dedicated clusters (e.g. Qdrant Cloud, Pinecone Pods, Weaviate Dedicated) have fixed hourly floor costs ($9 to $70+/mo minimum) but provide unlimited queries within node RAM capacity, making them substantially cheaper under sustained high-QPS production traffic.
How does INT8 Scalar and Binary Quantization reduce vector search TCO?
Scalar Quantization (INT8) compresses 32-bit floats into 8-bit integers, reducing memory requirements by 75% with negligible accuracy drop (<1% recall loss). 1-Bit Binary Quantization compresses vectors up to 32x, allowing millions of embeddings to reside in minimal RAM on affordable VPS instances (e.g. Hetzner Cloud) rather than expensive multi-gigabyte managed clusters.
When should I choose pgvector over a specialized vector database?
pgvector (on PostgreSQL, Supabase, Neon, or self-hosted) is ideal when your vector count is under 10-20 million and vectors reside alongside existing relational business data (users, auth, metadata). It eliminates dual-database sync lag and allows single ACID transactions. Dedicated vector engines (Qdrant, Milvus/Zilliz, Pinecone) become advantageous above 20M+ vectors where specialized distributed indexing (HNSW, DiskANN) outpaces Postgres vacuuming and shared memory.
What is the memory overhead of HNSW indexing?
Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) builds multi-layer proximity graphs to achieve sub-10ms nearest neighbor search. The graph edges and adjacency lists typically add 1.4x to 2.0x storage overhead on top of the raw vector arrays. For 1M 1536-dim vectors (6.14GB raw), an HNSW index typically requires ~9.2GB to 12GB of combined RAM and high-speed NVMe.
Why is self-hosting on a VPS (e.g., Hetzner) often 10x cheaper?
Managed cloud providers bundle multi-tenant compute markup, automated failover, and high gross margins into their storage and RU rates. Running open-source Qdrant, Weaviate, or pgvector on a modern NVMe VPS (e.g. Hetzner CPX31 with 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 160GB NVMe for $17.02/mo) provides dedicated raw hardware capable of serving millions of vectors at a fraction of hyperscaler rates.