Skip to main content
← All Sandbox Comparisons

HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-27

E2B vs Fly Machines

E2B and Fly Machines have no comparable captured rates — both render unranked in our engine, so no computed verdict exists. Compare their published plans directly via each row's source links.

Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks

100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
E2B: $8.28 Fly Machines: unranked
Not comparable — missing captured rates
500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
E2B: $82.80 Fly Machines: unranked
Not comparable — missing captured rates
2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
E2B: $662.40 Fly Machines: unranked
Not comparable — missing captured rates

Rate Card Snapshot

Vendor$/vCPU-hr$/GiB-hrBilling granularityConcurrency note
E2B$0.0504$0.0162per-secondHobby ≤20 concurrent sandboxes; Pro ≤100 (extensible to 1,100). Session caps: ≤1h Hobby, ≤24h Pro.
Fly Machinesincl.per-second

Fit Notes

  • E2B — Skip if your agents need long-lived environments — Hobby sessions die at 1h and Pro at 24h; this is for short-lived code-running sandboxes.
  • Fly Machines — Skip if you need a single per-vCPU+per-GiB price — Fly sells bundled presets that don’t decompose into our two-axis model; compare preset totals directly.

E2B

Strengths
Gotchas

Fly Machines

Strengths
Gotchas

Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, E2B or Fly Machines?

E2B and Fly Machines have no comparable captured rates — both render unranked in our engine, so no computed verdict exists. Compare their published plans directly via each row's source links.

How were these E2B vs Fly Machines costs computed?

Both vendors run identical workload profiles (sandbox-hours × vCPU/RAM) through the same engine using each vendor's captured USD list rates; the full methodology is on the agent-sandbox-pricing tool page.