Skip to main content
← All Sandbox Comparisons

HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-27

E2B vs Daytona

A dead heat on price: both bill $0.0504/vCPU-hr + $0.0162/GiB-hr, so every computed bill ties to the cent ($82.80/mo at the 500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB reference). The decision is pure platform fit — E2B owns the agent-framework mindshare but hard-caps sessions (≤1h Hobby, ≤24h Pro); Daytona counters with first-class LLM-agent tooling without the same session ceiling.

Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks

100 hr × 1 vCPU / 2 GiB
E2B: $8.28 Daytona: $8.28
Exact tie at this profile
500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB
E2B: $82.80 Daytona: $82.80
Exact tie at this profile
2,000 hr × 4 vCPU / 8 GiB
E2B: $662.40 Daytona: $662.40
Exact tie at this profile

Rate Card Snapshot

Vendor$/vCPU-hr$/GiB-hrBilling granularityConcurrency note
E2B$0.0504$0.0162per-secondHobby ≤20 concurrent sandboxes; Pro ≤100 (extensible to 1,100). Session caps: ≤1h Hobby, ≤24h Pro.
Daytona$0.0504$0.0162per-secondNo self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time.

Fit Notes

  • E2B — Skip if your agents need long-lived environments — Hobby sessions die at 1h and Pro at 24h; this is for short-lived code-running sandboxes.
  • Daytona — Skip if you want the most battle-tested SDK ecosystem — E2B has the larger community around code-interpreter sandboxes at identical rates.

E2B

Strengths
  • The SDK agent frameworks integrate first
  • $100 one-time credit + free Hobby tier
  • Per-second billing on both axes
Gotchas
  • Hobby ≤20 / Pro ≤100 concurrent sandboxes
  • Session caps force external state checkpointing

Daytona

Strengths
  • Identical rates with no Pro-plan paywall for realistic sessions
  • Purpose-built for LLM-agent workloads
  • Per-second billing on both axes
Gotchas
  • Smaller community than E2B
  • No meaningful free tier for sustained use

Run your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, E2B or Daytona?

A dead heat on price: both bill $0.0504/vCPU-hr + $0.0162/GiB-hr, so every computed bill ties to the cent ($82.80/mo at the 500 hr × 2 vCPU / 4 GiB reference). The decision is pure platform fit — E2B owns the agent-framework mindshare but hard-caps sessions (≤1h Hobby, ≤24h Pro); Daytona counters with first-class LLM-agent tooling without the same session ceiling.

How were these E2B vs Daytona costs computed?

Both vendors run identical workload profiles (sandbox-hours × vCPU/RAM) through the same engine using each vendor's captured USD list rates; the full methodology is on the agent-sandbox-pricing tool page.