HEAD-TO-HEAD · PRICES VERIFIED 2026-08-27
Daytona vs Beam (sandbox)
Across 3 benchmark profiles, Daytona prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~27% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.
Monthly Cost Across Realistic Benchmarks
Rate Card Snapshot
| Vendor | $/vCPU-hr | $/GiB-hr | Billing granularity | Concurrency note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daytona | $0.0504 | $0.0162 | per-second | No self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time. |
| Beam (sandbox) | $0.0675 | $0.0230 | per 0.001s | No self-serve concurrency cap published at capture time. |
Fit Notes
- Daytona — Skip if you want the most battle-tested SDK ecosystem — E2B has the larger community around code-interpreter sandboxes at identical rates.
- Beam (sandbox) — Skip if you want the biggest platform — young product; fine for browser/computer-use sandboxes, thinner on compliance and regions than E2B or Modal.
Daytona
StrengthsBeam (sandbox)
StrengthsRun your own workload through the full interactive calculator, or browse all pairs on the comparisons hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Daytona or Beam (sandbox)?
Across 3 benchmark profiles, Daytona prices lower in 3 of 3 — by up to ~27% where the gap is widest. Both rows use identical workload inputs and USD list rates from the capture-dated catalog; verify current rates via each vendor's source link.
How were these Daytona vs Beam (sandbox) costs computed?
Both vendors run identical workload profiles (sandbox-hours × vCPU/RAM) through the same engine using each vendor's captured USD list rates; the full methodology is on the agent-sandbox-pricing tool page.